<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Manuscript of Romanza discovered!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/</link>
	<description>The online resource for classical guitarists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holroyd Hammond</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Holroyd Hammond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 20:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Great sense of humor. Best laugh I&#039;ve had in a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great sense of humor. Best laugh I&#8217;ve had in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 04:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Ah, now if only someone could find the original manuscript for &quot;Kumbaya&quot; then all of the mysteries in the guitar world would be solved. Thanks for posting this great piece of scholarship. 

Thanks for sharing! : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, now if only someone could find the original manuscript for &#8220;Kumbaya&#8221; then all of the mysteries in the guitar world would be solved. Thanks for posting this great piece of scholarship. </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing! : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feng</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>feng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-415</guid>
		<description>This is make with Sibelius, Funny,hah~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is make with Sibelius, Funny,hah~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaypas</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>jaypas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I love it.  Sharp is optional.  Skip this note.  LoL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  Sharp is optional.  Skip this note.  LoL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Well, you had me going there and I thought it was original and all... until I reached the end.  There I noticed the note under the last measure : &quot;optional encore: fist 16 bars of Asturias&quot;.

There is a spelling mistake: it should be &#039;first&#039;, and not &quot;fist&quot;!!!!   Had it not been for that, I would never have guessed any wrongdoing.  But, my keen eye picked it out after all.

Therefore, I must conclude that this is a NOT an original manuscript!  Shameful indeed of you to try and pull this on us, Sir!

Fake Alert!  Fake Alert!  Fake Alert!   There... I said it, ha!

... lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you had me going there and I thought it was original and all&#8230; until I reached the end.  There I noticed the note under the last measure : &#8220;optional encore: fist 16 bars of Asturias&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is a spelling mistake: it should be &#8216;first&#8217;, and not &#8220;fist&#8221;!!!!   Had it not been for that, I would never have guessed any wrongdoing.  But, my keen eye picked it out after all.</p>
<p>Therefore, I must conclude that this is a NOT an original manuscript!  Shameful indeed of you to try and pull this on us, Sir!</p>
<p>Fake Alert!  Fake Alert!  Fake Alert!   There&#8230; I said it, ha!</p>
<p>&#8230; lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmh</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>wmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I agree with dofrenzy ...  who says classical guitar means not having a sense of humour? The article is in the &#039;fun&#039; section after all as well. Lighten up guys/ gals!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with dofrenzy &#8230;  who says classical guitar means not having a sense of humour? The article is in the &#8216;fun&#8217; section after all as well. Lighten up guys/ gals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dofrenzy</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>dofrenzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I just had to post a comment here to express my support!  While some may have lost respect for this site, it has earned me as a fan!  Funny!

This little article reminds me of the time when I learned the first half of Romanza!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to post a comment here to express my support!  While some may have lost respect for this site, it has earned me as a fan!  Funny!</p>
<p>This little article reminds me of the time when I learned the first half of Romanza!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arman</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Arman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Im with ANA this website is a joke and any one who thinks otherwise probably plays Nirvana to showoff, and probably thinks this place is an actual website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im with ANA this website is a joke and any one who thinks otherwise probably plays Nirvana to showoff, and probably thinks this place is an actual website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-269</guid>
		<description>I miss your humour Simon. 

Ana- Are you real, or a computer designed to be a total spaz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss your humour Simon. </p>
<p>Ana- Are you real, or a computer designed to be a total spaz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/new-manuscript-of-romanza-discovered/464/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarreview.com/?p=464#comment-267</guid>
		<description>I just lost all respect for this website; why would you let someone put up a blatant, fake, joke article about something as important  as one of the most popular and mysterious pieces in the classical guitar repertoire (satire in this context is just stupid). Ironically you allowing this article to stand defeats your purpose and only categorizes you with every other non-relevant and worthless website. I was excited when I first found your website; now I am not only disappointed but angry I wasted my time. Great job alienating the community you should be embracing. P. S. if they found the original manuscript who wrote it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just lost all respect for this website; why would you let someone put up a blatant, fake, joke article about something as important  as one of the most popular and mysterious pieces in the classical guitar repertoire (satire in this context is just stupid). Ironically you allowing this article to stand defeats your purpose and only categorizes you with every other non-relevant and worthless website. I was excited when I first found your website; now I am not only disappointed but angry I wasted my time. Great job alienating the community you should be embracing. P. S. if they found the original manuscript who wrote it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

